As the news on climate change becomes increasingly serious it is all the more important to affirm that the problem has solutions provided the world applies them soon enough.
Prominent UK environment writer Chris Goodall surveys some of those solutions in a well-researched fashion in his new book, Ten Technologies to Save the Planet. In combination he shows them adequate to the deep reductions of global greenhouse gas emissions needed over the coming decades.
On the renewable electricity front he explores wind power, solar energy and the tides and waves of the oceans. Where fossil fuel continues to be used for electricity he considers carbon capture and storage a viable technology and one which carries with it the additional possibility of extracting carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere for sequestration. Combined heat and power technologies through fuel cells and district heating plants using biomass offer significant emission reductions. House insulation and airtightness, including refurbishment of existing houses, are easy gains. On transport, he points to the fast advances in technology for battery driven electric cars, and to the large number of companies working on developing biofuels from cellulose. Wood part-combusted to make charcoal and dug into the ground both sequesters carbon and in many soils improves fertility. Finally, he details various better treatments of soil, trees and plants to improve their carbon-sink properties.
All the technologies Goodall canvasses already have solid indications of technical feasibility. Some of them, such as wind power, are in substantial operation. Together they present a credible world in which we could live in reasonable comfort and in a great deal more safety than our current path offers. There are further technologies, such as nuclear energy, which Goodall discounts but for which others make a strong case.
Altogether there is good reason to feel encouraged. We can decarbonise our energy and our industry. We are not doomed to destruction for lack of alternatives.
Why then, in view of the utter urgency of the need, isn’t the world in general and New Zealand in particular getting on with it? Goodall feels obliged to evaluate the technologies in terms of their cost relative to fossil fuel. But why should competitiveness with fossil fuel matter as much as it still seems to? We now understand that the continued burning of fossil fuel is dangerous for the human future. The fact that it may be cheaper in economic terms doesn’t lessen that danger.
Within a market economy, Goodall urges measures to put a price on carbon either through direct tax or through capped emissions trading schemes. He points out that a high carbon price (he suggests US$50 per tonne) would make almost all the technologies in his book competitive very soon. Against those who say the economy would be crippled he argues that in fact the impact on GDP will not be large.
But even if it were large, governments cannot allow the burning of fossil fuels to continue unhindered. The new technologies have to be adopted as rapidly as possible – by regulation and subsidy if market signals are not sufficient.
Unfortunately, many politicians remain scientifically ignorant and vulnerable to vested interests. Our own new government is still dithering, possibly even back-pedalling, on the modest measures adopted in the emissions trading scheme.
The recent calm and impressive statement of President-elect Obama may herald a new urgency. Announcing that he planned to reduce US 1990 emissions by 80% by 2050 through a cap and trade system and direct government investment in clean energy, he concluded: “Delay is no longer an option. Denial is no longer an acceptable response. The stakes are too high. The consequences, too serious.”
This column first appeared in the Waikato Times on 9 December 2008
Like this:
Like Loading...
Somehow Kevin Rudd’s climate change speech to the Lowry Institute earlier this month escaped my detection systems and it took Joseph Romm’s Climate Progress post today to draw it to my attention. New Zealanders, whose political leaders avoid big statements on the issue, can welcome its unequivocal tone. There seems an air of unreality to me in the emphasis our government places on catching up with Australia economically, with never a mention of the environmental challenges faced by that country. But Rudd meets them full on:
There are some amazing people in NZ. Just when I’m tearing (what’s left of) my hair out at the