IPCC

IPCC report: done well, could do better

by Gareth August 31, 2010

The InterAcademy Council report on the IPCC — Climate Change Assessments: Review of the Processes and Procedures of the IPCC — released yesterday, calls for “fundamental reforms” to the IPCC’s management structure and review processes. Climate Central provides a useful summary of the key findings: The IPCC should create an Executive Committee to run the [...]

33 comments Read the full article →

Report clears IPCC head Pachauri, UK paper apologises

by Bryan Walker August 27, 2010

Back in March I posted on IPCC Chairman Rajendra Pachauri’s stout defence of the IPCC report against the attacks to which it was being subjected by hysterical denialism.  But he has also had to defend himself against accusations in an article by Christopher Booker and Richard North in the Sunday Telegraphin December which claimed that [...]

5 comments Read the full article →

We call upon the author…

by Gareth June 29, 2010

I must have been asleep last week when the IPCC announced its selection of authors for the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5), due in 2013/14. As usual, NZ scientists are making a significant contribution: Tim Naish is a lead author for Working Group 1 (The Physical Science Basis) chapter 5, Information from Paleoclimate Archives. Jim Renwick [...]

1 comment Read the full article →

Sceptics face yawning credibility gap

by Bryan Walker June 23, 2010

We know that the vast majority of climate scientists support the explanation of anthropogenic climate change set out by the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change. That majority is now quantified in the first study of its kind published yesterday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Expert credibility in climate change. “Here, we [...]

28 comments Read the full article →

Sunday Times apologises for “Amazongate” misinformation

by Bryan Walker June 21, 2010

Three months after Simon Lewis laid a complaint with the UK’s Press Complaints Commission, which I reported here, the Sunday Timeshas retracted Jonathan Leake’s disgraceful Amazongate article and apologised to Dr Lewis. The article has been removed from their website. Here’s the apology: The article “UN climate panel shamed by bogus rainforest claim” (News, Jan [...]

8 comments Read the full article →

IPCC’s Pachauri fights back

by Bryan Walker March 28, 2010

“We have a very apt saying in Hindi, which essentially translates as: ‘When a jackal is threatened, he starts moving toward the city.’ In other words, he becomes more visible. I think some of these guys are speaking out volubly because they read the writing on the wall.” That was IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri in [...]

11 comments Read the full article →

The dangerous sea

by Bryan Walker March 18, 2010

This column was published in the Waikato Times on March 16. The media has paid disproportionate attention to an error in the monumental 2007 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.  In a chapter surveying the possible future impacts of climate change on the Asian region the report included a prediction that the Himalayan [...]

5 comments Read the full article →

Fight back, scientists urged

by Bryan Walker March 11, 2010

“The response to the [email] vandals is to bury them with the data and experience of a century of scholarly research and analysis. The information that is important in making the decisions as to how to manage our world is unequivocal and must be advanced, not as questions at the edge of scientific knowledge where [...]

24 comments Read the full article →

Al Gore going strong

by Bryan Walker March 1, 2010

That travesty of a news outlet, Fox News, carried an article last Thursday (in its science and technology section, believe it or not) which opened as follows: “Al Gore won a Nobel Prize and an Oscar for his film, An Inconvenient Truth. But in the last three months, as global warming has gone from a [...]

1 comment Read the full article →

The Listener joins the attack

by Bryan Walker February 22, 2010

“…serious and growing questions over the standards and credibility of the international body whose job it is to determine the scientific truths about climate change.”  The Listener is not going to be left out.  Ruth Laugesen writes in the current issue that “probes by a variety of international media have uncovered a smattering of poorly [...]

30 comments Read the full article →

← Previous Entries

Next Entries →