<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weekend reading: dealing with noise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hot-topic.co.nz/weekend-reading-dealing-with-noise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/weekend-reading-dealing-with-noise/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=weekend-reading-dealing-with-noise</link>
	<description>Global warming and the future of New Zealand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:26:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mspelto</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/weekend-reading-dealing-with-noise/comment-page-1/#comment-10806</link>
		<dc:creator>mspelto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/?p=4223#comment-10806</guid>
		<description>The OJ tie is good.  You can have a mountain of evidence indicating the volume loss of glaciers, and one item that is incorrect evidence on glacier demise in the Himalaya is the one piece of evidence that has ended up being most prominent.  Not that we have 18 consecutive years of negative mass balance globally, and 2009 will almost certainly be the 19th.  If that was a business it would long ago be bankrupt.  And that has happened to glaciers, some are going bankrupt and have or will disappear. 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://glacierchange.wordpress.com/2009/11/17/hinman-glacier-disappers/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Hinman Glacier &lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://glacierchange.wordpress.com/2009/07/19/milk-lake-glacier-loss/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Milk Lake Glacier &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The OJ tie is good.  You can have a mountain of evidence indicating the volume loss of glaciers, and one item that is incorrect evidence on glacier demise in the Himalaya is the one piece of evidence that has ended up being most prominent.  Not that we have 18 consecutive years of negative mass balance globally, and 2009 will almost certainly be the 19th.  If that was a business it would long ago be bankrupt.  And that has happened to glaciers, some are going bankrupt and have or will disappear.<br />
<a href="http://glacierchange.wordpress.com/2009/11/17/hinman-glacier-disappers/" rel="nofollow"> Hinman Glacier </a> or <a href="http://glacierchange.wordpress.com/2009/07/19/milk-lake-glacier-loss/" rel="nofollow"> Milk Lake Glacier </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

