<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The price of a policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hot-topic.co.nz/the-price-of-a-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/the-price-of-a-policy/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-price-of-a-policy</link>
	<description>Global warming and the future of New Zealand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 10:06:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/the-price-of-a-policy/#comment-6172</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 12:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/the-price-of-a-policy/#comment-6172</guid>
		<description>Amending the ETS is what they now say they will do, when the review is finished. What the coalition deal said was:

&lt;em&gt;National agrees to a review by a special select committee of Parliament of the current Emissions Trading Scheme legislation and any amendments or alternatives to it, including carbon taxes, in the light of current economic circumstances and steps now being undertaken by similar nations.

National further agrees to pass forthwith an amendment to the ETS legislation delaying its implementation, repealing the thermal generation ban and making any other necessary interim adjustments until the select committee review is completed.&lt;/em&gt;

More &lt;a href=&quot;http://hot-topic.co.nz/wagging-the-dog/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  National could have amended the ETS without such delay, by looking at the areas it signalled interest in discussing during the run up to the election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amending the ETS is what they now say they will do, when the review is finished. What the coalition deal said was:</p>
<p><em>National agrees to a review by a special select committee of Parliament of the current Emissions Trading Scheme legislation and any amendments or alternatives to it, including carbon taxes, in the light of current economic circumstances and steps now being undertaken by similar nations.</p>
<p>National further agrees to pass forthwith an amendment to the ETS legislation delaying its implementation, repealing the thermal generation ban and making any other necessary interim adjustments until the select committee review is completed.</em></p>
<p>More <a href="http://hot-topic.co.nz/wagging-the-dog/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.  National could have amended the ETS without such delay, by looking at the areas it signalled interest in discussing during the run up to the election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R2D2</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/the-price-of-a-policy/#comment-6171</link>
		<dc:creator>R2D2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/the-price-of-a-policy/#comment-6171</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t amend the ETS what they are doing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t amend the ETS what they are doing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/the-price-of-a-policy/#comment-6170</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/the-price-of-a-policy/#comment-6170</guid>
		<description>Rubbish R2. Key said they would &quot;amend&quot; the ETS, not commit to a root and branch review, which is what they agreed to in their deal with ACT.

Key actually agreed to &quot;suspend&quot; the ETS, though then did nothing about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rubbish R2. Key said they would &#8220;amend&#8221; the ETS, not commit to a root and branch review, which is what they agreed to in their deal with ACT.</p>
<p>Key actually agreed to &#8220;suspend&#8221; the ETS, though then did nothing about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R2D2</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/the-price-of-a-policy/#comment-6169</link>
		<dc:creator>R2D2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/the-price-of-a-policy/#comment-6169</guid>
		<description>Another well researched article Gareth .. cough cough

&quot;Key caved in so readily to Hideâ€™s demands for an ETS review&quot;

It was already well established:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiOQupvP8wE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another well researched article Gareth .. cough cough</p>
<p>&#8220;Key caved in so readily to Hideâ€™s demands for an ETS review&#8221;</p>
<p>It was already well established:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiOQupvP8wE" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiOQupvP8wE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

