<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Lomborg Deception</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hot-topic.co.nz/the-lomborg-deception/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/the-lomborg-deception/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-lomborg-deception</link>
	<description>Global warming and the future of New Zealand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 09:47:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomfarmer</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/the-lomborg-deception/#comment-11178</link>
		<dc:creator>tomfarmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/?p=4318#comment-11178</guid>
		<description>Several great analogies in this blog, Bryan. The &quot;offsetter&quot; got me going for one, and ratings agency AAA&#039;s etc.
My own take of several detailed searches re Lomborg is that he was always about political. Further, a willing aid and abetter of such distortion made possible through political channels. More particularly post-Bush II election and an administration hellbent against the UN.

For what it is worth I&#039;d say that that administration (which elevated Lomborg through the US Ambassador Bolton) used the guy to beat their bogie with. 

If there was such as thing as Administrative crime then it came to pass a mere 2/3 years after the following UN role was set down..
&lt;blockquote&gt;The role of the IPCC, as set out in 1988 by the UN Environment Programme and the World Meteorological Organisation, emphasises scientific objectivity, policy neutrality, balanced geographic representation, and consensus.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Consensus being the means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several great analogies in this blog, Bryan. The &#8220;offsetter&#8221; got me going for one, and ratings agency AAA&#8217;s etc.<br />
My own take of several detailed searches re Lomborg is that he was always about political. Further, a willing aid and abetter of such distortion made possible through political channels. More particularly post-Bush II election and an administration hellbent against the UN.</p>
<p>For what it is worth I&#8217;d say that that administration (which elevated Lomborg through the US Ambassador Bolton) used the guy to beat their bogie with. </p>
<p>If there was such as thing as Administrative crime then it came to pass a mere 2/3 years after the following UN role was set down..</p>
<blockquote><p>The role of the IPCC, as set out in 1988 by the UN Environment Programme and the World Meteorological Organisation, emphasises scientific objectivity, policy neutrality, balanced geographic representation, and consensus.</p></blockquote>
<p>Consensus being the means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

