<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tear-stained letter #2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hot-topic.co.nz/tear-stained-letter-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/tear-stained-letter-2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=tear-stained-letter-2</link>
	<description>Global warming and the future of New Zealand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 08:39:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Bloom</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/tear-stained-letter-2/#comment-4317</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Bloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 01:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/tear-stained-letter-2/#comment-4317</guid>
		<description>See the discussion about solar influence included &lt;a href=&quot;http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/2007/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  The upshot seems to be that while the effect is hard to measure exactly, the forcing is large enough that it must be doing something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See the discussion about solar influence included <a href="http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/2007/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.  The upshot seems to be that while the effect is hard to measure exactly, the forcing is large enough that it must be doing something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/tear-stained-letter-2/#comment-4316</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/tear-stained-letter-2/#comment-4316</guid>
		<description>Nitpick 1 accepted (and clarified in the text). Nitpick 2 may be true, but I rather thought the Â±0.1ÂºC attributed to TSI change over the solar cycle was still speculative rather than established (one paper?). It makes sense, but the signal is difficult to tease out of the data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nitpick 1 accepted (and clarified in the text). Nitpick 2 may be true, but I rather thought the Â±0.1ÂºC attributed to TSI change over the solar cycle was still speculative rather than established (one paper?). It makes sense, but the signal is difficult to tease out of the data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Bloom</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/tear-stained-letter-2/#comment-4315</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Bloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/tear-stained-letter-2/#comment-4315</guid>
		<description>Great post.  These are uncomfortable times for the libertarians to be promoting their economic ideas, so I suppose this sort of thing makes them feel better.  

Nitpicks:  1) Strictly speaking the fingerprint is stratosphere cooling in combination with troposphere warming.  2)  The solar minimum gets part of the credit for current temps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  These are uncomfortable times for the libertarians to be promoting their economic ideas, so I suppose this sort of thing makes them feel better.  </p>
<p>Nitpicks:  1) Strictly speaking the fingerprint is stratosphere cooling in combination with troposphere warming.  2)  The solar minimum gets part of the credit for current temps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

