<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spinning wheel&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hot-topic.co.nz/spinning-wheel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/spinning-wheel/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=spinning-wheel</link>
	<description>Global warming and the future of New Zealand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 11:23:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/spinning-wheel/#comment-5604</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 00:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/?p=2008#comment-5604</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The emissions limits in this study were prescribed such that they were approximately consistent with a stabilization of atmospheric concentration of CO2 at the level of 550 parts per million (ppm). With the inclusion of the radiative forcing associated with other non-CO2 greenhouse gases, this stabilization level is approximately a 675 ppm CO2-equivalent limit.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
From &lt;a href=&quot;http://globalchange.mit.edu/resources/gamble/scenario.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.

Seems high to me too. The model explicitly excludes carbon cycle feedbacks, which could already be in play. My preference is Hansen&#039;s 350...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The emissions limits in this study were prescribed such that they were approximately consistent with a stabilization of atmospheric concentration of CO2 at the level of 550 parts per million (ppm). With the inclusion of the radiative forcing associated with other non-CO2 greenhouse gases, this stabilization level is approximately a 675 ppm CO2-equivalent limit.</p></blockquote>
<p>From <a href="http://globalchange.mit.edu/resources/gamble/scenario.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
<p>Seems high to me too. The model explicitly excludes carbon cycle feedbacks, which could already be in play. My preference is Hansen&#8217;s 350&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garethw</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/spinning-wheel/#comment-5603</link>
		<dc:creator>garethw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 00:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/?p=2008#comment-5603</guid>
		<description>It looks like the Policy wheel is based on policy to get us to a stabilization of atmospheric concentration of CO2 at the level of 550ppm.
That seems REALLY high doesn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like the Policy wheel is based on policy to get us to a stabilization of atmospheric concentration of CO2 at the level of 550ppm.<br />
That seems REALLY high doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

