Comments on: NZ temps: more stations, no adjustments, still warming

By: Gareth

Gareth — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:03:52 +0000

The Norfolk police have all the information that I have — and probably a lot more besides. The probability that this was a “whistleblower” is small. The selection of emails for release was certainly made outside UEA.

By: Dr Checkzor

Dr Checkzor — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:42:36 +0000

Gareth
If you have information about the hacking, theft or otherwise of the CRU emails – that is info that is not in the public domain – then I suggest that you contact the Norfolk police asap as they are conducting an investigation into the issue.

Regards

By: Dr Checkzor

Dr Checkzor — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:28:50 +0000

Gareth,
Can you please redirect me to the appropriate discussion thread.

I would be interested to hear more on the emails

Thanks

[Extensive discussion here. GR]

By: Gareth

Gareth — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:05:05 +0000

My sources are excellent. The server in question was hacked multiple times, and the entire database was stolen. The released mails account for roughly 1% of the total stolen, and show signs of having been sorted and packaged for “release” on a computer or computers on the east coast of the US.

If you want to discuss the mails, could youplease take the discussion to a relevant post.

By: Dr Checkzor

Dr Checkzor — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:31:42 +0000

“emails released by thieves ”

What evidence do you have that the emails were stolen?

It seems most likely that they were released intentionally.
The file was called FOIA.zip – does that give any clues?

By: Gareth

Gareth — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:27:09 +0000

As I have said (ad nauseam), relying on the selection of emails released by thieves is like a judge listening only to the prosecution. Jones may have said a few things he regrets, but the words I used above most certainly do not apply to him.

By: Dr Checkzor

Dr Checkzor — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:22:06 +0000

@Gareth

“Not invective. Simple statements of fact. If a man misrepresents the truth, he is a liar. Princeton Wordnet suggests that a charlatan is â€œa flamboyant deceiverâ€, which looks like an equally a good description to me”

Judging by the East Anglia emails, these names would also equally apply to Phil Jones.

By: The annotated Rodney Hide: treating parliament with contempt â€” Hot Topic

The annotated Rodney Hide: treating parliament with contempt â€” Hot Topic — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:02:37 +0000

[...] appears happy to forget that stations that have not been adjusted show the very same rising trend. Well, there may be good reason for the [...]

By: Treadgold and the NZ CSC: dogging a fled horse â€” Hot Topic

Treadgold and the NZ CSC: dogging a fled horse â€” Hot Topic — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:24:44 +0000

[...] criticisms by generating a new temperature series — with no adjustments at all — that confirms the trends in the longer series. But the CSC/CCG keep going, firing off an OIA request. Predictably, they [...]

By: Phil Scadden

Phil Scadden — Thu, 24 Dec 2009 08:06:13 +0000

Dappledwater – I think your comment to Terry are somewhat uncharitable given his willingness to engage and goodwill. Some Christmas spirits perhaps?