<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NZ sceptics lie about temp records, try to smear top scientist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hot-topic.co.nz/nz-sceptics-lie-about-temp-records-try-to-smear-top-scientist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/nz-sceptics-lie-about-temp-records-try-to-smear-top-scientist/</link>
	<description>Global warming and the future of New Zealand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 09:51:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sorry seems to be the hardest word — Hot Topic</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/nz-sceptics-lie-about-temp-records-try-to-smear-top-scientist/#comment-10871</link>
		<dc:creator>Sorry seems to be the hardest word — Hot Topic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/?p=3622#comment-10871</guid>
		<description>[...] last week Richard Treadgold, author and principal promoter of the recent attempt to cast doubt on the long term temperature record for New Zealand, popped up on Hot Topic to leave [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last week Richard Treadgold, author and principal promoter of the recent attempt to cast doubt on the long term temperature record for New Zealand, popped up on Hot Topic to leave [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Taylor</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/nz-sceptics-lie-about-temp-records-try-to-smear-top-scientist/#comment-10419</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/?p=3622#comment-10419</guid>
		<description>Australis, IMHO you are wasting your time grasping at meaningless straws. If you want to worry about something, make it something real - like this:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/02/100209191445.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Australis, IMHO you are wasting your time grasping at meaningless straws. If you want to worry about something, make it something real &#8211; like this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/02/100209191445.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.sciencedaily.com/re.....191445.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Australis</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/nz-sceptics-lie-about-temp-records-try-to-smear-top-scientist/#comment-10414</link>
		<dc:creator>Australis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/?p=3622#comment-10414</guid>
		<description>Okay. You don&#039;t know. Nor does anybody else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay. You don&#8217;t know. Nor does anybody else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Scadden</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/nz-sceptics-lie-about-temp-records-try-to-smear-top-scientist/#comment-10410</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Scadden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/?p=3622#comment-10410</guid>
		<description>&quot;So what makes you sure that NIWA’s 1990 adjustments to the 1943 raw data at Hokitika were objective and accurate – or even had the right sign?&quot; 
You have the raw data, the papers on methodology. You do it. Question, in light of all the indexes indicating warming, why are you so sure NIWA is not to be trusted?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So what makes you sure that NIWA’s 1990 adjustments to the 1943 raw data at Hokitika were objective and accurate – or even had the right sign?&#8221;<br />
You have the raw data, the papers on methodology. You do it. Question, in light of all the indexes indicating warming, why are you so sure NIWA is not to be trusted?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Australis</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/nz-sceptics-lie-about-temp-records-try-to-smear-top-scientist/#comment-10404</link>
		<dc:creator>Australis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/?p=3622#comment-10404</guid>
		<description>Yes, I understand there have been changes at virtually all New Zealand temp stations. This may include the 11 which didn&#039;t need adjustments to show warming?

So what makes you sure that NIWA&#039;s 1990 adjustments to the 1943 raw data at Hokitika were objective and  accurate - or even had the right sign?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I understand there have been changes at virtually all New Zealand temp stations. This may include the 11 which didn&#8217;t need adjustments to show warming?</p>
<p>So what makes you sure that NIWA&#8217;s 1990 adjustments to the 1943 raw data at Hokitika were objective and  accurate &#8211; or even had the right sign?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The annotated Rodney Hide: treating parliament with contempt — Hot Topic</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/nz-sceptics-lie-about-temp-records-try-to-smear-top-scientist/#comment-10383</link>
		<dc:creator>The annotated Rodney Hide: treating parliament with contempt — Hot Topic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/?p=3622#comment-10383</guid>
		<description>[...] done by Treadgold and the CSC. That Hide should rely on stuff that had already been widely and publicly discredited says a very great deal about his willingness to play fast and loose with the facts in order to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] done by Treadgold and the CSC. That Hide should rely on stuff that had already been widely and publicly discredited says a very great deal about his willingness to play fast and loose with the facts in order to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Treadgold and the NZ CSC: dogging a fled horse — Hot Topic</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/nz-sceptics-lie-about-temp-records-try-to-smear-top-scientist/#comment-10324</link>
		<dc:creator>Treadgold and the NZ CSC: dogging a fled horse — Hot Topic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/?p=3622#comment-10324</guid>
		<description>[...] Coalition and Richard Treadgold&#8217;s &#8220;Climate Conversation Group&#8221; to cast doubt on the NZ temperature record and to smear the scientists who have worked on it has stepped up a notch or two in recent days, following a response by NIWA to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Coalition and Richard Treadgold&#8217;s &#8220;Climate Conversation Group&#8221; to cast doubt on the NZ temperature record and to smear the scientists who have worked on it has stepped up a notch or two in recent days, following a response by NIWA to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/nz-sceptics-lie-about-temp-records-try-to-smear-top-scientist/#comment-10050</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/?p=3622#comment-10050</guid>
		<description>If NIWA hasn&#039;t kept &quot;worksheets&quot; from the 1970s &amp; 80s (before NIWA existed in its current form), are we surprised? Not much shock horror there.

NIWA is going to to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10623169&amp;pnum=0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;post&lt;/a&gt; all temp data and adjustments soon. No doubt Treadgold and his pals will find something to complain about, and continue their revolting and ignorant smear campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If NIWA hasn&#8217;t kept &#8220;worksheets&#8221; from the 1970s &#038; 80s (before NIWA existed in its current form), are we surprised? Not much shock horror there.</p>
<p>NIWA is going to to <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&#038;objectid=10623169&#038;pnum=0" rel="nofollow">post</a> all temp data and adjustments soon. No doubt Treadgold and his pals will find something to complain about, and continue their revolting and ignorant smear campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R2D2</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/nz-sceptics-lie-about-temp-records-try-to-smear-top-scientist/#comment-10044</link>
		<dc:creator>R2D2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/?p=3622#comment-10044</guid>
		<description>&quot;Did you miss it? The big lie? There are no reasons for any large corrections. That’s it, there. And it’s a lie because the NZ CSC has known for at least three years why adjustments have been made to certain stations.&quot;

Wishart and the NZCSC are claiming that NIWA do not have records of the adjustments (see link below). So who is lying? Do you have egg on your face again Gareth for trusting what your buds at Niwa told you or are Wishart and NZCSC mistaken?

http://briefingroom.typepad.com/the_briefing_room/2010/02/breaking-news-niwa-reveals-nz-original-climate-data-missing.html#comments</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Did you miss it? The big lie? There are no reasons for any large corrections. That’s it, there. And it’s a lie because the NZ CSC has known for at least three years why adjustments have been made to certain stations.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wishart and the NZCSC are claiming that NIWA do not have records of the adjustments (see link below). So who is lying? Do you have egg on your face again Gareth for trusting what your buds at Niwa told you or are Wishart and NZCSC mistaken?</p>
<p><a href="http://briefingroom.typepad.com/the_briefing_room/2010/02/breaking-news-niwa-reveals-nz-original-climate-data-missing.html#comments" rel="nofollow">http://briefingroom.typepad.co.....l#comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Surface Temperature Records: Policy Driven Deception? &#171; Wott&#39;s Up With That?</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/nz-sceptics-lie-about-temp-records-try-to-smear-top-scientist/#comment-9987</link>
		<dc:creator>Surface Temperature Records: Policy Driven Deception? &#171; Wott&#39;s Up With That?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/?p=3622#comment-9987</guid>
		<description>[...] Third, his first two &#8220;Case Studies in Data Manipulation&#8221; are very recent debunked denialist failures (Darwin Airport, Australia, Wellington, NZ). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Third, his first two &#8220;Case Studies in Data Manipulation&#8221; are very recent debunked denialist failures (Darwin Airport, Australia, Wellington, NZ). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
