<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nitrous oxide no laughing matter for ozone layer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hot-topic.co.nz/nitrous-oxide-no-laughing-matter-for-ozone-layer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/nitrous-oxide-no-laughing-matter-for-ozone-layer/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=nitrous-oxide-no-laughing-matter-for-ozone-layer</link>
	<description>Global warming and the future of New Zealand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 07:02:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgedarroch</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/nitrous-oxide-no-laughing-matter-for-ozone-layer/#comment-6629</link>
		<dc:creator>georgedarroch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 08:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/nitrous-oxide-no-laughing-matter-for-ozone-layer/#comment-6629</guid>
		<description>Yes, that is true, and I&#039;m in no position to say how likely it is that the protocol will be revised again to include N2O.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that is true, and I&#8217;m in no position to say how likely it is that the protocol will be revised again to include N2O.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/nitrous-oxide-no-laughing-matter-for-ozone-layer/#comment-6625</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 06:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/nitrous-oxide-no-laughing-matter-for-ozone-layer/#comment-6625</guid>
		<description>The Montreal Protocol doesn&#039;t cover N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O, George. The evidence in this paper, however, suggests that ignoring N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O emissions because they&#039;re only a small part of the total GHG load is not a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Montreal Protocol doesn&#8217;t cover N<sub>2</sub>O, George. The evidence in this paper, however, suggests that ignoring N<sub>2</sub>O emissions because they&#8217;re only a small part of the total GHG load is not a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgedarroch</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/nitrous-oxide-no-laughing-matter-for-ozone-layer/#comment-6623</link>
		<dc:creator>georgedarroch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 05:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/nitrous-oxide-no-laughing-matter-for-ozone-layer/#comment-6623</guid>
		<description>The Montreal Protocol is a robust international agreement - New Zealand will not just be able to ignore it. It&#039;ll be a pleasure watching the usual suspects squirm as they realise New Zealand cannot parlay it&#039;s obligations, not without significant cost to the country&#039;s relations with major trading partners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Montreal Protocol is a robust international agreement &#8211; New Zealand will not just be able to ignore it. It&#8217;ll be a pleasure watching the usual suspects squirm as they realise New Zealand cannot parlay it&#8217;s obligations, not without significant cost to the country&#8217;s relations with major trading partners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

