<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Censoring Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hot-topic.co.nz/censoring-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/censoring-science/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=censoring-science</link>
	<description>Global warming and the future of New Zealand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:09:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Walker</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/censoring-science/comment-page-1/#comment-18216</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 18:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/?p=1233#comment-18216</guid>
		<description>Tom, Griffin was certainly inclined to the denial camp. Bowen reports remarks he made to a reporter on radio in 2007. After acknowledging that a trend of global warming exists he said: &quot;To assume that it is a problem is to assume that the state of Earth&#039;s climate today is the optimal climate...and that we need to take steps to make sure it doesn&#039;t change...I think that&#039;s a rather arrogant position for people to take.&quot; One prominent scientist said Griffin&#039;s remarks demonstrated that he was either &quot;totally clueless&quot; or &quot;a deep anti-global warming ideologue&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, Griffin was certainly inclined to the denial camp. Bowen reports remarks he made to a reporter on radio in 2007. After acknowledging that a trend of global warming exists he said: &#8220;To assume that it is a problem is to assume that the state of Earth&#8217;s climate today is the optimal climate&#8230;and that we need to take steps to make sure it doesn&#8217;t change&#8230;I think that&#8217;s a rather arrogant position for people to take.&#8221; One prominent scientist said Griffin&#8217;s remarks demonstrated that he was either &#8220;totally clueless&#8221; or &#8220;a deep anti-global warming ideologue&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomfarmer</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/censoring-science/comment-page-1/#comment-18180</link>
		<dc:creator>tomfarmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 07:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/?p=1233#comment-18180</guid>
		<description>Bryan,

this comment is way late on the topic but when I looked over one of the links to Bowen he came up with a guy called Griffin @ NASA (a bushtail appointee) who I was pretty sure backed to Reagan&#039;s Starwars thing.

why worth mentioning.. for me at anyrate, it&#039;s that Mirowski (qv Mashey)has a pretty detailed proposition on how scientists employed in the Milz-Industrial-Complex (ie Baliunas, Singer, Seitz et al) were pushed out when Starwars failed and ended up in the GMI for instance on a contention beat against climate scientists the new boys on the block. 

To me it adds a sensible edge for why a kind of scifight could and would be set up by MIC people. Griffin looks infill, as it were, and likely well-placed to operate political circuits alongside these displaced &#039;physicists&#039;. 

mebbe useful..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan,</p>
<p>this comment is way late on the topic but when I looked over one of the links to Bowen he came up with a guy called Griffin @ NASA (a bushtail appointee) who I was pretty sure backed to Reagan&#8217;s Starwars thing.</p>
<p>why worth mentioning.. for me at anyrate, it&#8217;s that Mirowski (qv Mashey)has a pretty detailed proposition on how scientists employed in the Milz-Industrial-Complex (ie Baliunas, Singer, Seitz et al) were pushed out when Starwars failed and ended up in the GMI for instance on a contention beat against climate scientists the new boys on the block. </p>
<p>To me it adds a sensible edge for why a kind of scifight could and would be set up by MIC people. Griffin looks infill, as it were, and likely well-placed to operate political circuits alongside these displaced &#8216;physicists&#8217;. </p>
<p>mebbe useful..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Storms of My Grandchildren â€” Hot Topic</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/censoring-science/comment-page-1/#comment-9320</link>
		<dc:creator>Storms of My Grandchildren â€” Hot Topic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/?p=1233#comment-9320</guid>
		<description>[...] Science: Inside the Political Attack on Dr. James Hansen and the Truth of Global Warming, reviewed here. Some of this ground is traversed again here, and then Hansen offers readers the bad news that the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Science: Inside the Political Attack on Dr. James Hansen and the Truth of Global Warming, reviewed here. Some of this ground is traversed again here, and then Hansen offers readers the bad news that the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sound of silence â€” Hot Topic</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/censoring-science/comment-page-1/#comment-5312</link>
		<dc:creator>Sound of silence â€” Hot Topic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 02:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/?p=1233#comment-5312</guid>
		<description>[...] work hard to avoid the suspicion that &#8212; in an echo of attempts by the Bush administration to muzzle Jim Hansen &#8212; management fired Salinger because he was refusing to be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] work hard to avoid the suspicion that &#8212; in an echo of attempts by the Bush administration to muzzle Jim Hansen &#8212; management fired Salinger because he was refusing to be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climate Code Red â€” Hot Topic</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/censoring-science/comment-page-1/#comment-4820</link>
		<dc:creator>Climate Code Red â€” Hot Topic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 05:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/?p=1233#comment-4820</guid>
		<description>[...] Bowen&#8217;s Censoring Science, recently reviewed on Hot Topic is obviously still [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bowen&#8217;s Censoring Science, recently reviewed on Hot Topic is obviously still [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonno</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/censoring-science/comment-page-1/#comment-4611</link>
		<dc:creator>jonno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/?p=1233#comment-4611</guid>
		<description>It already has...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It already has&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ayrdale</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/censoring-science/comment-page-1/#comment-4610</link>
		<dc:creator>Ayrdale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/?p=1233#comment-4610</guid>
		<description>Time will tell...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time will tell&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonno</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/censoring-science/comment-page-1/#comment-4609</link>
		<dc:creator>jonno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/?p=1233#comment-4609</guid>
		<description>What invigorates me and keeps me going is that you, Ayrdale and others like you, like claiming this. Yet, any &#039;evidence&#039; you bring to the table has already been disproven. Is you (I doubt you or Chris can) bring any new evidence to the table, and then you may be right. The ironic thing is, it is your so called evidence that has holes in it.

That is my point, and itâ€™s self evident.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What invigorates me and keeps me going is that you, Ayrdale and others like you, like claiming this. Yet, any &#8216;evidence&#8217; you bring to the table has already been disproven. Is you (I doubt you or Chris can) bring any new evidence to the table, and then you may be right. The ironic thing is, it is your so called evidence that has holes in it.</p>
<p>That is my point, and itâ€™s self evident.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ayrdale</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/censoring-science/comment-page-1/#comment-4608</link>
		<dc:creator>Ayrdale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/?p=1233#comment-4608</guid>
		<description>Thank you I&#039;ve had a look at those.
What impresses me most in the thread of WattsupWithThat are the comments and debate.
What invigorates me and keeps me going  is that you Bryan and others on this site are dogmatic and  convinced that the debate is over, when any interested person can see, read and hear that it plainly is not over.
Chris de Freitas and many hundreds of other scientists continue to punch holes in the mantra that rising atmospheric CO2 causes rising global temperatures.
Scientific studies underway right now will continue to enlarge our knowledge (I refer to ARGOS, the Ibuki satellite and the CERN Cloud studies as 3 of many) and the results from these will aid our understanding of climate mechanisms.
With developing knowledge we can make progress. We certainly can&#039;t make any progress as a nation or a species by claiming the issue is settled, and the debate finished.
That is my point, and it&#039;s self evident.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you I&#8217;ve had a look at those.<br />
What impresses me most in the thread of WattsupWithThat are the comments and debate.<br />
What invigorates me and keeps me going  is that you Bryan and others on this site are dogmatic and  convinced that the debate is over, when any interested person can see, read and hear that it plainly is not over.<br />
Chris de Freitas and many hundreds of other scientists continue to punch holes in the mantra that rising atmospheric CO2 causes rising global temperatures.<br />
Scientific studies underway right now will continue to enlarge our knowledge (I refer to ARGOS, the Ibuki satellite and the CERN Cloud studies as 3 of many) and the results from these will aid our understanding of climate mechanisms.<br />
With developing knowledge we can make progress. We certainly can&#8217;t make any progress as a nation or a species by claiming the issue is settled, and the debate finished.<br />
That is my point, and it&#8217;s self evident.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Walker</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/censoring-science/comment-page-1/#comment-4605</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/?p=1233#comment-4605</guid>
		<description>Ayrdale, your &quot;wonderful&quot; wattsupwiththat thread is about a NASA scientist John Theon who retired 15 years ago and was never Hansen&#039;s boss.  Have a look at a couple of Gavin Schmidt&#039;s comments on Real Climate - it won&#039;t take long:
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/01/warm-reception-to-antarctic-warming-story/#comment-110819
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/01/warm-reception-to-antarctic-warming-story/#comment-110917</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ayrdale, your &#8220;wonderful&#8221; wattsupwiththat thread is about a NASA scientist John Theon who retired 15 years ago and was never Hansen&#8217;s boss.  Have a look at a couple of Gavin Schmidt&#8217;s comments on Real Climate &#8211; it won&#8217;t take long:<br />
<a href="http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/01/warm-reception-to-antarctic-warming-story/#comment-110819" rel="nofollow">http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/01/warm-reception-to-antarctic-warming-story/#comment-110819</a><br />
<a href="http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/01/warm-reception-to-antarctic-warming-story/#comment-110917" rel="nofollow">http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/01/warm-reception-to-antarctic-warming-story/#comment-110917</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

