<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aquaflow&#8217;s NZ tech impresses China</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hot-topic.co.nz/aquaflows-nz-tech-impresses-china/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/aquaflows-nz-tech-impresses-china/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=aquaflows-nz-tech-impresses-china</link>
	<description>Global warming and the future of New Zealand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:17:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/aquaflows-nz-tech-impresses-china/#comment-18839</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 14:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/?p=3549#comment-18839</guid>
		<description>Yes your right about the sizzle and no sausage. The claims made by the company and especially Nick Gerritsen are pure fantasy - the company was going to supply aviation fuel for a much publicized   test flight  about 3 years ago  but that did not happen. They found it was very difficult and totally uneconomic to make  biofuel from wild algae. They have made only minute sample quantities of bio-crude  and have no  viable commercial process.The company then made a  series of exaggerated claims about it water remediation process  that has also faltered. Every time the company receives an inquiry  from an interested party a press release is generated making various exaggerated   claims - many companies have looked at their so called process but have walked a way. Latterly the company has  lost most of its staff they seek more secure positions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes your right about the sizzle and no sausage. The claims made by the company and especially Nick Gerritsen are pure fantasy &#8211; the company was going to supply aviation fuel for a much publicized   test flight  about 3 years ago  but that did not happen. They found it was very difficult and totally uneconomic to make  biofuel from wild algae. They have made only minute sample quantities of bio-crude  and have no  viable commercial process.The company then made a  series of exaggerated claims about it water remediation process  that has also faltered. Every time the company receives an inquiry  from an interested party a press release is generated making various exaggerated   claims &#8211; many companies have looked at their so called process but have walked a way. Latterly the company has  lost most of its staff they seek more secure positions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le Chat Noir</title>
		<link>http://hot-topic.co.nz/aquaflows-nz-tech-impresses-china/#comment-8262</link>
		<dc:creator>Le Chat Noir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hot-topic.co.nz/?p=3549#comment-8262</guid>
		<description>While this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v27/n1/full/nbt0109-15.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;piece&lt;/a&gt; in Nature Biotechnology in Jan 2009 does not mention Aquaflow, it does attempt to present a realistic view of progress in the heavily hyped field of algal biofuels. Dr John Benemann is a leading authority on algal biofuels. In a position &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fao.org/uploads/media/algae_positionpaper.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;paper&lt;/a&gt; (PDF) written for the FAO in 2008 he summarized his view as follows: 

&lt;blockquote&gt;
  The cultivation of microalgae for biofuels in general and oil production in particular is not yet a commercial reality and, outside some niche, but significant, applications in wastewater treatment, still requires relatively long-term R&amp;D, with emphasis currently more on the R rather than the D. This is due in part to the high costs of even simple algae production systems (e.g. open, unlined ponds), and in even larger part to the undeveloped nature of the required algal mass culture technology, from the selection and maintenance of algal strains in the cultivation systems, to achievement of high productivities of biomass with a high content of vegetable oils, or other biofuel precursors.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So in summary â€“ lots of sizzle but little sign of the steak â€“ so far at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While this <a href="http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v27/n1/full/nbt0109-15.html" rel="nofollow">piece</a> in Nature Biotechnology in Jan 2009 does not mention Aquaflow, it does attempt to present a realistic view of progress in the heavily hyped field of algal biofuels. Dr John Benemann is a leading authority on algal biofuels. In a position <a href="http://www.fao.org/uploads/media/algae_positionpaper.pdf" rel="nofollow">paper</a> (PDF) written for the FAO in 2008 he summarized his view as follows: </p>
<blockquote><p>
  The cultivation of microalgae for biofuels in general and oil production in particular is not yet a commercial reality and, outside some niche, but significant, applications in wastewater treatment, still requires relatively long-term R&amp;D, with emphasis currently more on the R rather than the D. This is due in part to the high costs of even simple algae production systems (e.g. open, unlined ponds), and in even larger part to the undeveloped nature of the required algal mass culture technology, from the selection and maintenance of algal strains in the cultivation systems, to achievement of high productivities of biomass with a high content of vegetable oils, or other biofuel precursors.
</p></blockquote>
<p>So in summary â€“ lots of sizzle but little sign of the steak â€“ so far at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

